Talk:Plateway

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plateway article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Transport

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should this page be merged with wagonway? Pt1234 16:52, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wagonways even earlier

Wagonways were even older than plateways, and sometimes consisted of grooved stone blocks, with no iron plates aka rails.

Tabletop 12:36, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Plateway and wagonway

Plateways had cast iron flanged rails. Wagonways began in the 17th century and like modern railways had the flange on the wheel. Oppose merge. (Sorry, forgot to sign it originally) Peterkingiron 18:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article covers similat ground to a section in Wagonway. I wonder whether material should be transferred from there to here, making this a sub-article to that one, dealing in detail with pre-mainline iron railways. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I support a merge. There is massive overlap throughout this and other areas. The modern "rail tracks" and "permanent way" pages are full of historical development material too, and I believe it is out of place there.

The solution is a single modern rail technology page and a single "development of railway tracks" page, encompassing plateways, wagonways and all the development stuff in the "modern" pages.

This is a huge editing task; I will try and start it in a couple of weeks time; obviously any other collaboration before during or after is most welcome. --Afterbrunel (talk) 08:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted from your redirect. This is the target you chose doe not reflect the conmtent of this article. WE already have

and several more parallel articles that need to be rationalised (by merger), but what you did jumps over 200 years of development. I would suggest that converting articles to redirects should be at the end of the process, not its beginning. What you did was not a merger. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sketch missing

A sketch, or sketches, might be very welcome for users that are not specialists in the field.

Nuremberg / Bavaria, Nawrôz 2016 - Ángel.García2001 ~ ~ ~ ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.138.76.13 (talk) 10:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. There seems to be a good image here, but I can see no indication about its copyright. Might an editor who understands WP copyright follow up this issue, please? Feline Hymnic (talk) 19:47, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, I have swapped around the two existing pictures, so that the lead of the article can more clearly illustrates the features that distinguish the relatively unfamiliar plateway from the more familiar railway. Feline Hymnic (talk) 17:26, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inside or outside flange

Virtually all plateways had the flanges on the inside. Is there any documented reason for this? Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]