Talk:Planet of the Spiders

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Final appearance of Mike Yates

How can this story be the final appearance of Mike Yates if Franklin reprised the role in The Five Doctors? I'd say it should be regular appearance, except he wasn't in the two preceeding episodes. Should this cast note be deleted? Terrypin 08:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Franklin appeared as a false apparition of Yates in The Five Doctors. So in a sense this is his last appearance in that the character never reappears (just fake images of him do). DonQuixote 14:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Worth a mention?

Just wondered if the Spiders have any relation to when Donna Noble had a similar thing with the Time Beetle (insect on the back and the like). It say's in the wiki of the episode "turn Left" that the design of the time beetle was influenced by the spiders. So isi is worth a mention? Also if there was any negative reaction to the sterotypical 'Oriental' portrayal, and if it is worth mentioning? Why they did not get an Oriental to play the part confuses me as they had already used a Chinese actress to play Chin Lee just a couple of years before. Black actors had been apearing in episodes for years, yet K'anpo is cringe worthy at the best of times (opinion given from a white guy who strongly disagrees with political correctness and likes Al Jolston). I may be alone in this opinion, but if they had a white guy 'blacked up' to play Kemel in Evil of the Daleks, it would certainly not be seen in a positive light. These are just mere suggestions (not a debate) as to whether or not they are worth a mention:) DarkMithras27/06/2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.246.254 (talk) 20:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No relation. The Spiders were earth spiders that were mutated by the Metabelese Crystalls. DonQuixote (talk) 03:36, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DarkMithras/anon, why not just google for this stuff yourself? If it's been mentioned somewhere else in a reliable third party source, then it's probably worth mentioning. Your own opinions though, would only count as OR. WikiuserNI (talk) 09:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The 'turn left' comment was more a passing thought, but I could find nothing on Google regaurding the use of yellow face, hence I asked:( Al I could find is this, which means nothing really http://seeingred.livejournal.com/47975.html .........I do refrain from writing on Wiki though as my grammar is not great and I do not know the correct way to write here (I have an account here and dont even know how to sign my name lol). So I mention things in this part. There is always more information that in Google anyway (like old magazines and the like) which never seem to get published on the net, or are forgotten.

Odd, because the Talons of Weng-Chiang has had critisism for racism, and this hasn't. Maybe it just wasn't that bad and I am being silly, c'est la vie. DarkMithras 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.246.254 (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DVD release date

Still searching for a reliable source which gives a firm release date for the R2 DVD, other than the vague "2011" as implied by Doctor Who Magazine. It's only two days since the BBFC issued a certificate for the extras, yet we have an IP who has twice added 18 April 2011 immediately before the DWM ref. No such date is given in that magazine. drwho-online show it as TBA. Amazon don't recognise the title other than for the VHS version and the Target novel. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A lot can happen in 24 hours. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Planet of the Spiders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110606151859/http://gallifreyone.com/episode.php?id=zzz to http://gallifreyone.com/episode.php?id=zzz

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]