Talk:Planet V

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

How big??

Anyone having any reference saying how big this spaceboulder was? Rursus 19:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer myself: about 0.25 marses up to not 1 mars. Rursus 21:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer on a non-asked question: Planet V orbited at 1.9 AU, while asteroid belt is at c:a 2.3-3.9 and Mars at 1.5 AU. Rursus 21:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Deletion debate

This article was merged with and redirected to Vanbrugh College (University of York) as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash^talk 20:43, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MYA

"4,000 [million years ago] ago"? Is that the customary use of mya? Also, the mya page claims it should be lowercase. Thuktun 20:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mya = MYA = Mya = million years ago in the planetary science literature. Michaelbusch 21:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mya (unit) states it is supposed to be written in lower-case. Let's at least be consistent across Wikipedia. At the very least, the 4,000 should not be part of a link to unit definition. Tomalak Geret'kal (talk) 18:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Um, what is the reception the rest of the planetary science community has given this theory? -- Beland (talk) 02:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made a punctuation edit which was reverted.

The second paragraph contains a sentence which is erroneously broken up into two sentences via a period:

"While long-lived this orbit was unstable on a time-scale of 600 Myr. Eventually perturbations from the other inner planets drove Planet V onto a high-eccentricity orbit which crossed into the inner asteroid belt."

The former portion is a fragment and should be connected by a comma. After making this change, I received a notice that I had made "unhelpful edits" which have been reverted. Since this seems to be an instance where a mod simply hasn't had his coffee yet, I am again making the correction in the hopes that this time, the mod pays better attention to the change that was made and why it was needed. 173.166.110.9 (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]