Talk:Plan Nine Publishing

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 October 2009. The result of the discussion was No consensus.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics: Webcomics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.

Name

Is the name of Plan 9 Publishing a reference to the OS or the movie? --maru (talk) contribs 21:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Things that need work on this page

The page leads off talking about how well known the publisher is, when it should instead focus on how influential the publisher was on the start of the period of economic success of webcomics artists.

Each assertion about which notable comic Plan 9 published should be verified and referenced.

Netmouse (talk) 17:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have put the statements in the article in the past tense - pending confirmation that they are still in operation (which I have requested from the company through e-mail). The website is registered until 3-Oct-2010, being renewed this October (see WHOIS lookup). However, as this was through 1&1, I know (as they host my various domains), that they auto-renew registration unless specifically notified not to, so that does not prove that the website/company are still in use. Until verification otherwise is found, I suggest that we keep it in the past tense - we can always change to the present tense if we find that the company is alive and kicking! -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 12:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]