This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Snow Close - There may be a discussion to have about whether or not we should have an article about Native American warriors per se, but this is not that. (non-admin closure) FOARP (talk) 18:51, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, primarily per the discussion linked by Vizjim above. The discussion on that page refutes the idea that "braves" is the common name in contemporary usage. Additionally, this article discusses Great Plains warfare practices in a fairly general sense, which makes the current title feel most appropriate for the subject matter. ModernDayTrilobite (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(As a digression: I do think the article should be renamed to "Plains Indian warfare". Per WP:CAPITALIZATION, "warfare" shouldn't be capitalized, and changing "Indians" to "Indian" would be an improvement along WP:NATURAL. However, when it comes to a change in the direction of "braves", I'm opposed.) ModernDayTrilobite (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close. Move back to the original titleRestore the original article, which appears to have been Brave (Native Americans), sort out the utter mess of a history and cock-up of multiple moves and redirects without discussion to illogical and poorly-constructed titles (did those moving it even bother to read article title guidelines?) and then propose a new RM. These moves have completely buggered up the page history. Experienced editors should know better than to blank a long article and redirect it to a new article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is an inaccurate summary of events. The consensus discussion was to change the page to a redirect, not to move the content. Vizjim (talk) 15:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's not how Wikipedia works and you should know that. You don't just destroy an edit history in this way. The original article should be restored and then a new RM opened. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Walk me through how you see that working? I'm not being snide - I'd genuinely appreciate a steer on the technicalities. We start with a page named for "braves," a 19th century stereotype, but containing material that is generally well researched about Plains Indians war customs. A consensus discussion has already decided that references to "braves" should, to be accurate, point to the stereotype of Native American warriors. However, enough research has been done to allow for an article on the historical battle customs of a group of Native nations (though this article also has a lot of colonial mythology and needs a good clean up). So should the process be to request a move, and, assuming it is again a consensus agreement, then maintain the old page as a redirect to the stereotypes article? Vizjim (talk) 08:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, restore the original article and then request a move from that to another title. If achieved, then the original title can be redirected to what you want it to redirect to. But don't just blank it, redirect it and then transfer much of its content to a new article. That's not how it's done. Along the way, the edit history has now been completely lost. It looks like a wholly new article and it isn't. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this is a bizarre discussion. "Braves" is an outdated / stereotypical term to refer to the participants in the warfare, so it doesn't really make sense as an article title. But there's abundant coverage of "Plains Indian warfare" in reliable sources so I think the article should be improved and expanded, as well as renamed to "Plains Indian warfare" to fix the capitalization issue. (t · c) buidhe08:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
