Talk:Plack (software)

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plack (software) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Perl (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Perl, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PerlWikipedia:WikiProject PerlTemplate:WikiProject PerlPerl articles

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

PROD and PSGI merge

Given search reveals multiple books referencing both PSGI and Plack and failure to identify the quality of the PROD procedure is questionable. I am unsure if the former PROD has disrupted into a merge marriage of convenience or is a genuine good fit (I simply don't know), and perhaps also if procedure has been fully technically followed. Unfortunately I have other things to do but cannot fail to object to the PROD on this article as a minimum given the books; and may revisit later.Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While it was prompted by a prod, I think merging PSGI is a good fit. Plack is the first exemplar application framework implementing PSGI and they are often discussed together in the literature. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 11:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disurption

This Plack/PSGI seem to be the focus of disruption from muliple IP addresses at the moment which is taking a disruptive amount of effort to resolve It seems there is a negative COI.Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are also disrupting Wikipedia by adding content not backed by independent sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.174.3.214 (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of independent sources

6 years has passed waiting for independent sources to be provided. I will remove content not backed by independent sources as Wikipedia requires. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.174.3.214 (talk) 14:41, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policies do not require uncontroversial content to be backed by independent sources. And given that PGSI was PROD'd by an anon IP when a merge and book references were present, and this article PROD'd following that merge again when references exists I feel that there is an attempt to remove content. Please concentrate on improving the article with a positive attitude by adding references and content. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do want to note this IP address seems to be making a similar comment from a recently IP address that was blocked previously seen here. As they have a dynamic IP address, their contributions can be monitored here. – The Grid (talk) 17:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]