Talk:Placental abruption

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Placental abruption.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Would anybody think that including examples of people who were born after this happened be beneficial? Tim Tebow is the example that comes to my mind, though I'm sure there are others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.155.26.70 (talk) 18:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My goals

During this month of editing, I hope to add and cite more resources, make sure the article follow's wiki's suggested framework, and to cite more current literature. The article will give the readers a basic understanding of what is placenta abruption. My audience is non-medical professionals, so I want to make sure it is readable to them. Additionally, I want to work on the article's lead to make it clear and concise. Veronicagon4 (talk) 18:17, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peer-review response

Thank you for your contributions to wikipedia! I especially like the quantity of citations and content that you placed in the prognosis section.

Suggestions that I have for you to continue revisions include the following:

Consider writing a topic sentence under the "Classification" heading
Consider making a diagnosis category from the first paragraph of information that is currently posted under the "Management" section.
Consider rewriting the sentence about Rhogam for the non-medical user.
Simplify words such as hypofibrogenemia and tetanic
Continue adding citations throughout the remainder of the article.

Let me know your thoughts on these ideas. Rkronen

Response to peer-review

Thank you for your suggestions Rkronen!

I have taken into consideration and responded to the majority of your suggested edits.

I wrote a topic sentence under the "Classification" heading.
I made a diagnosis category from the first paragraph of information that was previously posted under the "Management" section.
I have continued to add citations throughout the article since you last reviewed it.
I will continue attempting to simplify medical terms.

Thanks again! :) Veronicagon4 (talk) 19:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]