Talk:Pitambar Deva Goswami

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 May 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://article.wn.com/view/WNAT6747EBE846C21D8547C63C1FAB3772DB/#/related_news, http://dvspublishers.com/index.php?option=com_djcatalog2&view=item&id=11:satra-society-and-culture--pitambardeva-goswami-and-hisory-of-garamur-satra-&cid=5:culture&Itemid=82, and http://www.srimanta.net/contents_l3.php?q=5&ID=3&ID3=40&link_caption=SRI%20SRI%20PITAMBAR%20DEVA%20GOSWAMI. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy Section

In my opinion, the author, or someone with knowledge of the subject, needs to completdely re-write the "Philosophy" section. As it stands now, it doesn't make much sense and is intermingled with accomplishments and excludes critical information such as why the subject was jailed.Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pitambar Deva Goswami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080517120930/http://www.expressindia.com/ie/daily/20000710/ina10046.html to http://www.expressindia.com/ie/daily/20000710/ina10046.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pov push writing

A certain editor has continuously pushed their narrative (POV) in this page, by putting some spurious text, with the support of some vague citation from a author, who doesn't even speak anything of this topic.

I have reverted those edits, with my justifications, but this has been reinstated by that editor without any proper acknowledgement or defence. ComparingQuantities (talk) 16:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]