Talk:Pirate Party Australia

	Australia portal Pirate Party Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Pirate Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pirate Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Pirate PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Pirate PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Pirate PoliticsPirate Politics articles

User:Yagankiely/PPAU

There is a previous draft at User:Yagankiely/PPAU that may have something to include here. --Apoc2400 (talk) 00:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remove euthanasia section

I attempted to do this and it was reverted. The justification provided was that sources are provided therefore it should stay.

I cannot get the link to resolve myself, but I am curious as to whether or not it is appropriate for an organisational page to contain activities of associated members and whether it is notable enough merely because there was an article written about it.

Notwithstanding, I've moved it under "Policy and platform" for now. I still think it should be removed. --Bbqsrc (talk) 04:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was pretty notable at the time because it dealt with two matters: firstly, as a part of the on-going euthanasia debate in Australia (following the brief period it was legal in the Northern Territory); and secondly, the training was conducted around the same time that then Minister for Communications, Senator Stephen Conroy was promoting his Internet censorship policy (the so-called "Clean Feed"). So running a training session for people to circumvent censorship back then was basically waving a red flag in front of the bull that was the Rudd Labor government of the time. Remember Conroy wanted to ban "dangerous information" too dangerous for us mere mortals.

I, however, have better sense than to even consider editing this article at this time, for all the obvious reasons (well, except for spelling fixes, link fixes and vandalism reversion). Maybe after the next Congress, though. ;) --BenM (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]