Talk:Pirate Party (Sweden)
Pirate Party (Sweden) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article candidate |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pirate Party (Sweden) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elaboration on principles?
[edit]I find it odd that the majority of the article focuses on membership over time, and offers very little material on their policies and platform. I see the brief one-liners given in the principles section, but it isn't at all clear to me the philosophy behind their principles, nor how they have acted or attempted to influence legislation. Not ignoring their relationship with the Pirate Bay and Wikileaks, I think it would be prudent to expand on their platform and action, and reduce the focus on their recruitment success-rate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.57.119.134 (talk) 17:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Aenchevich (talk) 21:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)== EU parliament (clarification) ==
I would like to advocate improving the EU Parliament field in the summary sidebar as well as the EU Parliament section in the main article. At present both are rather cryptic and misleading :
a) because Sweden (according to the "European Parliament" article) currently holds 18 seats in the EUP, not 20.
b) because it appears as though the Swedish PP holds 2 seats out of the total 20 seats of the EU Parliament. But the EUP does not have 20 seats (of course) but 736 seats. IMO, since this is supposed to denote number of seats the SwPP holds in the EUP, "2/736" would be more appropriate and infomrative. Or perhaps "2/18/736" with some appropriate comments explaining what the numbers mean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aenchevich (talk • contribs) 20:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Misleading numbers
[edit]This article appears to focus on membership over time. But, the time period included ends just before a precipitous drop in membership providing a highly misleading account. Statisticians have a word for that. According to the Pirate Party, their current membership is 8691. To see a full chart, see http://data.piratpartiet.se/Charts/MemberCountHistory.aspx?EndDate=2013-11-30&Days=3000&XSize=826&YSize=590. It is clear from the current chart that the chart in the article ends just prior to the decline. It is clear from the article wording that an impression is being attempted that is false. Also see https://pirateweb.net/Pages/Public/Data/MemberCountHistory.aspx. 108.41.173.242 (talk) 20:50, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pirate Party of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090417001447/http://www.piratpartiet.se:80/international/english to http://www.piratpartiet.se/international/english
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090611150651/http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de:80/en/europawahlen/EU_BUND_09/ergebnisse/bundesergebnisse/b_tabelle_99.html to http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/en/europawahlen/EU_BUND_09/ergebnisse/bundesergebnisse/b_tabelle_99.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Pirate Party of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090417021816/http://www.piratpartiet.se:80/storlek to http://www.piratpartiet.se/storlek
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090417021816/http://www.piratpartiet.se:80/storlek to http://www.piratpartiet.se/storlek
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090417001447/http://www.piratpartiet.se:80/international/english to http://www.piratpartiet.se/international/english
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)