Talk:Piotr Skut
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 May 2010. The result of the discussion was merge to List of The Adventures of Tintin characters. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Skut.gif
[edit]Image:Skut.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Identifying with Estonia
[edit]The article reads (in part):
- "In either case, it is remarkable that he identifies with Estonia which was de facto part of the Soviet Union when Hergé published The Red Sea Sharks in 1958."
Why would that be so remarkable? In 1958, Estonia had only been part of the Soviet Union for thirteen years. Skut is portrayed as a grown man, but not old, so was presumably born and raised during the times of Estonia's (first) independence and/or the second World War. In fact, if he's gallivanting around the Western world as a mercenary in the mid-fifties, the most plausible back-story for the character would be that he's been in exile since the end of WWII, after having fought against the Soviets. (i.e, in effect, on the German / Finnish side. cf 20th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Estonian).) Not so remarkable an identification at all, then, now is it? -- CRConrad (talk) 08:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's been over a month without counterargument, so I'm going to boldly go ahead and cautiously edit the article now.--CRConrad (talk) 11:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)