Talk:Pioneer Village station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Canada: Ontario / Toronto C‑class Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Dubious claim of no fare booths

Yesterday I visited the six stations on the extension -- it was opening day.

This article claims none of the new stations will have fare booths. But I certainly saw TTC fare booths. Geo Swan (talk) 14:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DATES

The consensus is that the article should use the date format MDY.
Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I think the date format in this article should be DMY not MDY as is fairly standard for Canadian articles. Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As per MOS:DATETIES, "Articles related to Canada or Israel may use either format (July 4, 1976 or 4 July 1976) with (as always) consistency within each article". In my experience, the former is more common. Examples include: Canada, Justin Trudeau, Line 1 Yonge–University, Toronto subway, and adjacent stations on the same subway line (York University station, Highway 407 station).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Blaixx (talk • contribs) 01:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with you. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:56, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice you disagree and all, but MOS:DATEVAR says we keep the existing format, which is mdy. Most TTC stations are mdy; some are dmy. Since both formats are acceptable in Canada-related article, as Blaixx has pointed out on more than one occasion, you have zero legs to stand on. Also, I edit tonnes of Canadian articles and I would actually say the bulk are mdy. Whether you like that or not, or I like that or not, is irrelevant. It's also ridiculous to have called an RfC on this without attempting to have a discussion first. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PV station - RFC

Which date format should this article use? DMY or MDY? Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:55, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MDY – per MOS:DATETIES and MOS:DATEVAR. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MDY – I think the MOS is very clear and unambiguous. BLAIXX 20:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MDY for the text, and it really doesn't matter to me what the ref date format is as long as they are consistent. Summoned by bot. I use YMD (2018-09-18) myself for the refs, but if I edit an existing article, I try to keep the format consistent with the most common existing format. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lawsuit

Noting some sources that can be used for this in the article: [1][2][3]. ~UN6892 ^t_c 23:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]