Talk:Pink slime/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Encycloshave (talk · contribs) 14:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Tick box
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: overall, but a few
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Review Comments
[edit]- Reliable sources:
- "Seven Million Pounds of “Pink Slime” Beef Destined for National School Lunch Program" is a Yahoo blog, which which may not meet the standards of WP:IRS. What do we know of the editorial control and reliability of Yahoo writers? And what do we know about Sarah B. Weir?
- A few bits are sourced from company-run sites, but most are duplicated by reliable news sources.
- Neutrality: Neutrality issues raised on the talk page seem to have been addressed.
- Stable: There seemed to have been some concerns in April, but they seem to have been addressed.
Cheers! Encycloshave (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2012 (UTC)