Talk:Pink Lady (duo)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Japan: Music Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:24, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Music task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Possible correction

"released their first song in English ("Love Showdown")"

I believe the correct title is "Love Countdown", which appears on their US release, unless the article is referring to a different song.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.118.152 (talk) 09:02, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Single14.gif

Image:Single14.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pink Lady in 2010.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pink Lady in 2010.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which is which

I forgot which is which. It would be helpful to label the photo. The separate article for the two women doesn't have any picture either. Eregli bob (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 February 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved - consensus against (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 23:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Lady (band) → Pink Lady
Pink Lady → Pink Lady (disambiguation)

– Nine number one hits in Japan makes it clear the Japanese pop duo deserves primary topic rights. Also Pink Lady → Pink Lady (disambiguation). ミラ P 20:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firm oppose - This band is at best 3rd place in page views behind the medicine and the cocktail. ミラ should consider withdrawing this. -- Netoholic @ 20:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose and the second time at least that Miraclepine has proposed a move without looking at page views before doing so. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No clear primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:11, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see how anything can lay claim to primary topic here._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:47, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - In the English-speaking world, Pink Lady means more than the duo, unlike in Japan. Also, if anything, perhaps "Pink Lady (band)" should be redirected to "Pink Lady (group)", as "band" implies that they play instruments when they actually don't. - Areaseven (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would support move to Pink Lady (duo) as a precise application of WP:SINGERDAB. -- Netoholic @ 14:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. 16% of the page views is a seriously bad WP:PTOPIC#1 fail. Narky Blert (talk) 12:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The number of hits in Japan is irrelevant to whether the duo is the primary topic; and is particularly irrelevant to whether it is the primary topic among English-language speakers, the audience for enwiki. Netoholic's analysis is spot-on and shows why this page should not be the primary.

I would support the suggested move to Pink Lady (duo), though; that makes a lot of sense. TJRC (talk) 01:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per the above discussion. Page views show that this is not the primary topic. Aoba47 (talk) 22:50, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 19 February 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 00:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Lady (band) → Pink Lady (duo) – The prior RM was declined (I think appropriately), but Netoholic pointed out that the page more properly belongs at Pink Lady (duo), given the guidance at WP:SINGERDAB; both "(band)" and "(duo)" are allowable, but "(duo)" is more precise. I'd be bold and just move it, but in light of the prior discussion, I think it's more appropriate to air the idea first. TJRC (talk) 00:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support as uncontroversial move straight out of WP:SINGERDAB. -- Netoholic @ 06:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.