Talk:Pim Fortuyn List/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tarret ^talk 19:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Very good article on a very interesting topic.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covered the main points. For FA-class it is recommended that the article be expanded more to reflect this political party's effect on European politics. Also, tell me more about the Fortuynism ideology (what ideologies is it similar to etc.)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Gret article and keep up the good work. Also, come visit WP:GAN and help review some articles.