Talk:Pilot (The Cleveland Show)
Pilot (The Cleveland Show) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 3, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Pilot (The Cleveland Show)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bennv123 (talk · contribs) 09:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Bennv123 (talk) 09:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, but I have to quickfail this. Here are some glaring issues:
- Potential copyright violation: The most concerning issue. The plot summary in this article has some overlap with an external blog, although it is not clear whether Wikipedia copied the blog, or the blog copied Wikipedia. This needs to be clarified.
- Unreferenced content: I added a {{citation needed}} tag in the "Release & Reception" section. But besides the plot and ratings, most of the content in the lead is not mentioned or sourced anywhere else in the article. Please note that the WP:LEAD should summarize the body of the article, and claims made in the lead should be verified in the body as well.
- Lack of broad coverage: Besides the plot and reception, there should, at the very least, be a section covering some basic production aspects of the episode. The "Release and reception" section also only highlights 3 reviews (IGN, AV Club, PTC) and does not give a representative overview of what critics' thought. For example, the lead claims "critics praised its storyline and numerous cultural references", yet the reception section only says negative things about the episode. Moreover, undue weight seems to be given to PTC, especially considering it is a partisan source. Overall, the article only cites 5 references, which doesn't inspire confidence that it reflects a broad survey of reliable sources.
Based on these issues, I think the article meets WP:QF. Bennv123 (talk) 10:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Re: copyright issues
[edit]Regarding potential copyright violations brought up at Talk:Pilot (The Cleveland Show)/GA1, I've looked at the article history and it's pretty clear the external blog is the one that copied from Wikipedia (specifically The Cleveland Show (season 1)). Bennv123 (talk) 07:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- Start-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- Start-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class Episode coverage articles
- Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class Comedy articles
- Low-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles