Talk:Pilot (Desperate Housewives)/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 16:47, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
I will review soon. Ruby2010 comment! 16:47, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- There is one dab link
- Fixed. Akcvtt (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- [1] is a deadlink
- Replaced. Akcvtt (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- "on the American Broadcasting Company (ABC)." It premiered on the network, not the company. Maybe change to "on the ABC network (or something similar)
- Done. Akcvtt (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- "Actors originally considered for the role include Courteney Cox,[19] Calista Flockhart,[19][20] Heather Locklear,[19] Julia Louis-Dreyfus,[4], Mary-Louise Parker,[19][21] and Sela Ward.[22] Julia Louis-Dreyfus also expressed interest in the role, but network executives felt she was not right for the part.[4]" You mention Julia Louis-Dreyfus twice
- Fixed. Akcvtt (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Make sure sentences with direct quotes have citations directly after the period (mostly needed in reception section)
- Done. Akcvtt (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- I know the pilot was good, but were there any notable negative reviews?
- While writing the section and after another internet search just now, there aren't any notable negative reviews. It appears the pilot received universal acclaim. There are a few negative reviews that refer to the entire first season as a whole, but they do not specifically mention the pilot. Akcvtt (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Websites with no offline printings, like TV Squad, The Futon Critic, and The A.V. Club, are not italicized
- Done. Akcvtt (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ref 48 needs an access date
- Done. Akcvtt (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Overall it was a well-written and interesting article. Just make the changes I suggested above, and it will be good to go. I'll place the review on hold for seven days in the meantime. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 17:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Your changes looks great, but there is still the remaining deadlink. Use the external links tool if you are unsure which ref the link corresponds to. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 04:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for catching that. I replaced the link with a different article. Akcvtt (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- The article now looks GA-worthy, so I'll pass it. Very nice work! Ruby2010 comment! 17:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)