Talk:Piggybacking (Internet access)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.

2007-04-9 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal Antennas?

Unless someone can show evidence that the statement "The sale of these antennas has been banned in the United States and many other countries." is true, I am going to remove it. 66.53.222.254 (talk) 08:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I remember reading that somewhere. I don't remember where, but it sounds true. Hellno2 (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The statement "Making one homemade is possible with some skills. Still, doing so may be illegal" should also be removed. Cr6564 (talk) 02:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Hampshire

I don't understand the bill ratification process. Can someone fill me in?

The bill in question, which would legalize both wardriving and piggybacking on unsecured networks, is House Bill 495. It was passed by the New Hampshire House in March 2003, and was then reviewed by the state's Senate Judiciary Committee. If they approved it, it would take effect January 2004?

So did it take effect or not? The only thing I can find is "6/5/03, pending motion ITL, Judiciary, SJ 19, pg. 634", which is meaningless to me.

Here's a billion articles: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] — Omegatron 05:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote to Lee Tien of the EFF, who is quoted in the Wired article, and he points out that the language of the bill is not in the current wording, so it must not have passed. (I think this would be the latest version.) He also points out that the current wording isn't really that bad, though. It is an "affirmative defense" if the user believed that they had been authorized, would have been authorized (if they'd asked?), or could not have known that their use was unauthorized. And of course, none of this has anything to do with this article, anyway, since the laws are predominantly about piggybacking. — Omegatron 23:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reading through the references, it's clear that state law varies wildly, and I don't know how we can summarize it in a short section. I doubt we want to include copies of every law like we do for New Hampshire. I'm not sure how to address this.— Omegatron 16:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But one thing is very clear: Whoever tried to make this article say that it is definitely prohibited is wrong, and the article was not neutral or accurate at that time. — Omegatron 16:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The last external link pointing to here appears to be broken. it should be checked that it's not temporary site failure or smth alike - Stypex 12:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Hackers offering fake wireless points

Not certain if this article is the most appropriate but there's growing concern that legitimate Wifi hotspots and piggybackers might be at risk for hackers...

http://globaltechforum.eiu.com/index.asp?layout=rich_story&doc_id=10329&title=Ensnared+on+the+wireless+Web&categoryid=2&channelid=3

--24.23.88.171 (talk) 22:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.examiner.com/a-667352~Towson_gets_free_wireless_Internet.html
Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]