Talk:Pig candy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Bacon task force, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Untitled

This is not some kind of small time thing we're talking about here. Pig candy is the next big food and you can't shut it down just because Im not a chef. I mean what if this becomes the next new food group. We'll all look silly. I mean come on guys, some women wrote a book on this [[1]]. This is an American pastime. Don't let it go the way o the dodo. Chillax and make sure that we don't make a mistake we would really regret. Collegeprofessor123 (talk) 22:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I disagree with the above users arguments (the book is not about Pig Candy, and Wikipedia does not predict the future), a casual Google search reveals a large number of hits, and the article (while it needs a lot of work) does, at the least, not qualify for CSD A1. (EhJJ)^TALK 22:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I am not endorsing the current article nor the editor who created it, and I have no objection to a delete. I don't want to see this dragged through an AfD if it clearly needs to be written from scratch, so I'm all for a snowball delete. Just saying that the topic may be notable. (EhJJ)^TALK 22:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I love you. Have you read the book? Collegeprofessor123 (talk) 22:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, but the editorial reviews make it clear that the book is about a daughter/father relationship, and that the Pig Candy is just incidental. (EhJJ)^TALK 22:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pig candy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090112080759/http://www.locallabels.com:80/catalog_g92.html?catId=283580 to http://www.locallabels.com/catalog_g92.html?catId=283580

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]