Talk:Picturenation

I think this article is rather too biased, the tone suggests it was written by someone with affiliation to the site/company. I quote:

Picturenation for Schools As the old blackboard is becoming obsolete, children are being educated with interactive learning tools, computers and interactive whiteboards on a daily basis. Picturenation images can be used on computers, mobiles, and whiteboards for lessons. Schools use Picturenation images knowing that they have been checked and cleared for copyrights and all the accompanying text checked for accuracy and relevance. Picturenation is accredited partners with Promethean

That, to me, reads like a straight-up advert. The changelog also seems to corroborate someone from the site writing the article, and making efforts to "cover up" the inadequate quality of the article.

In my opinion, the biased sections should be removed entirely, the Child Picture Policy section retained and the rest of the article condensed into a brief history.

Thoughts?

Dominicowood2 (talk) 11:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)