Talk:Picture to Burn/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs) 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

My first impression of this article is that it is of good size, and of reasonable quality.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The lede is excellent. I think country music should be changed to country in the 'Composition' section. I really don't understand the sentence 'Swift's boasts with big vocals that span two octaves, from G3 to C5'.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The GAC link does not link to the blog post that is being referenced.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Overall a good article, but I think the above should be addressed before I pass this. Toa Nidhiki05 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I have made a few changes and since Ipodnano's busy in real life, I'd be happy to address the remaining issues, if there are any. Novice7 (talk) 11:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, my concerns are addressed, so I'm promoting this. Congrats! Toa Nidhiki05 13:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Novice7 (talk) 04:29, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]