Talk:Pick–Sloan Missouri Basin Program

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

South Dakota Mid‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Montana

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Separate sections

There should be a mini-article on each project within the Plan, with a link to the full article.

I have a better understanding of the Oahe project and can start that.

Cadillac Desert will probably help this page out and expand its information.

Ab2kgj (talk) 18:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

In the Sloan plan I would maybe try to find more information and details, especially because you said his plan was more intricate. Also, I feel like with encyclopedias people may start reading at a certain heading, so maybe treat "The Sloan Plan" as its own entry instead of comparing it so much to Pick's plan. For example, if someone only wanted to know about Sloan's plan they would start there and when you say "One year later" the reader wouldn't know what that means.

Under "The Omaha Conference" I would reword the sentence "The compromise allowed the Corps of Engineers to retain control over flood control and navigation projects and five main-stem dams" it is kind of confusing to read and uses control two times close together and a lot of "and"s.

Very nice article!! The only other thing I can think of is maybe another image to add to your article possibly!

Mcissne2 (talk) 06:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Mackenzie Cissne[reply]

Peer Review

Some of the wording is a bit complex. You could focus on shortening the first sentence so it is more understandable on the first read.

Great use of internal links throughout the article!

I'm wondering if there could be more information added in some sections. Seems like Native American Relocation could be more talked about.