Talk:Physics (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

I think this article (Physics (journal)) must not redirect to "Physical Review" but should point to the "Physics" (http://physics.aps.org/)Mironets (talk) 21:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well feel free to create the article. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 23:35, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Third-party sources

Headbomb, I don't understand why you've removed {{third-party}} from the article. The only refs are for the publisher's website. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which are 1) perfectly acceptable for sourcing the information that is currently present 2) supplemented by the further reading section. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 11:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peer-reviewed?

Is it a magazine or journal? Fgnievinski (talk) 02:51, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other Journals with same title

There is at least on more Journal with the same title. I only know it from Bell's theorem, which appeared in 1964 in a Journal called Physics. No idea whether this was also by APS. The article Bell's theorem links to this page here, but this seems wrong because it would break causality. IXhdBAH (talk) 10:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]