Talk:Physicians' Desk Reference

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Medicine C‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anyone

Anyone have info on editions newer than 2005? --Galaxiaad 16:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated 2011 info from manf'r description of 2011 volume. Leef5 (talk) 15:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is the PDR junk? Has entries for quack products.

Has the PDR descended to the level of a Who's Who scam? Looking at http://www.pdr.net/full-prescribing-information/essentia-water?druglabelid=3618 = https://archive.is/IIw2M and http://www.amazon.com/2015-Physicians-Desk-Reference-Edition/dp/1563638304 makes me think there is very little oversight - they basically will print whatever information manufacturers feed them. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02118883?term=Essentia&rank=1 confirms the study was done, but come on. Water ionizers are bunk. --Elvey^(t•c) 03:40, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Physicians' Desk Reference/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Very important entry in Wikepedia (recognizing the PDR), but I am having trouble (as expected, no doubt!) in accessing the actual drug information. I HAVE an OLD PDR, but I want very current information on, for example, both of these COPD meds: Performist and Bravana. How do I get info on these new drugs without having to buy a new PDR or driving to the library to look at their (possibly outdated) PDR ??

Last edited at 07:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 02:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Physicians' Desk Reference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110829073953/https://www.pdrbookstore.com/ProdDetails.asp?ID=9781563637803&PG=1&Type=BL&PCS=PDR to https://www.pdrbookstore.com/ProdDetails.asp?ID=9781563637803&PG=1&Type=BL&PCS=PDR

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Look up losartan

What is it Larry margul (talk) 19:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ldmargulmd Larry margul (talk) 19:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Losartan Larry margul (talk) 19:06, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]