Talk:Physical therapy education

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lead and title

Needs a lead and a better title. I suggest moving this to Physical therapy education. Similar articles exist: Medical education and Chiropractic education. -- Brangifer (talk) 02:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And perhaps it should be renamed "physiotherapy training" as that is the title used in most of the world. Fuzbaby (talk) 01:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the discussion on the Physical therapy talk page on the terminology of physiotherapy vs physical therapyDoctorDW (talk) 19:16, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...not sure if I agree on the reasoning, but I'll follow the talk on that page.

If no one objects to my suggestion above, I'll soon move this page to the title I have suggested. This truncated title isn't even proper grammatically. -- Brangifer (talk) 14:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move accomplished. In the process, I also added a lead and removed a couple tags that were made irrelevant. -- Brangifer (talk) 01:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lead could be developed a bit more, but should not be a duplication of the PT article. -- Brangifer (talk) 01:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References needed!

Each section desperately needs references. They exist, so please start finding them! The websites for each PT association will usually have a section about education in that country. Please link to it. -- Brangifer (talk) 01:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Half of this information isn't sourced at all... I mean this page doesn't even contain fully accurate and up to date information! CoupCoup34 (talk) 17:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference #7 is no longer available. Do you have other sources to replace it? Alphapeta (talk) 07:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/download/666/890. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sam Sailor 11:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]