Talk:Phrack
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Phrack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does anyone know whether phrack.ru is permanently or temporarily down (or empty)? Perhaps it should be removed from the article? Keesiewonder talk 23:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- I just accessed it right now, so it's (back) up...? --florkle 09:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
phone hacking
[edit]I just removed this edit. If it is indeed true, please blend your edit in to existing content, or create a disambiguation page. --Keesiewonder talk 21:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- The Hacker Crackdown says it's a portmanteau of phreak and hack. --h2g2bob (talk) 22:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Merging Hacker Manifesto into Phrack
[edit]I don't really see why it should be merged. Could you argue? --Arnauld (talk) 08:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- So do I. I think the Hacker Manifesto is an important text that stands on its own. Although it was originally published in Phrack, there is no inherent relation between the text and the magazine. —Alexander Konovalenko (talk) 12:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- I totally agree with Alexkon, it is a paper on his own not to be merged CGA (talk) 13:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Phrack 66
[edit]A new release of phrack was issued on 6/11/2009. Phail Saph (talk) 16:26, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Arrest of Knight Lightning
[edit]Courts do not find a person innocent in the US - potential verdicts are guilty and not guilty. Corrected, but someone may like to use more elegant phrasing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.254.100.195 (talk) 01:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Phrack 67
[edit]Phrack 67 is out, ladies and gentlemen! DokReggar (talk) 12:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Phrack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://phrack.com/owned-by.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100704065529/http://www.phrack.org/cfp_p67.txt to http://www.phrack.org/cfp_p67.txt
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080830082912/http://www.vnunet.com/itweek/comment/2086023/worms-unhappy-returns to http://www.vnunet.com/itweek/comment/2086023/worms-unhappy-returns
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Longest running hacker zine?
[edit]It seems the cited statement from insecure.org "[Phrack] is the best, and by far the longest running hacker zine out there" can't be entirely true, given that Phrack's first issue came out in November 1985 whereas 2600's first issue was released in January 1984. Mb720 (talk) 22:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class magazine articles
- Unknown-importance magazine articles
- WikiProject Magazines articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles
- Mid-importance Computer Security articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Computer Security articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- C-Class St. Louis articles
- Unknown-importance St. Louis articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Missouri articles
- Unknown-importance Missouri articles