Talk:Phosphorylethanolamine
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
To do
[edit]Add : more properties (solubility, melting point ...), how it is made, any natural sources, industrial or other uses. - Rod57 (talk) 16:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Controversy in Brazil
[edit]Article could at least mention : Brazil bill would legalize renegade cancer pill. Summary "A showdown over a controversial cancer therapy has intensified, pitting Brazil's scientists against its congress. Last week, responding to a clamor from politicians and desperate patients, the congress voted to legalize the production and distribution of synthetic phosphoethanolamine, even though the putative cancer drug has not been clinically tested or registered with the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency. Scientists blast the legislation as a travesty. Apart from patient testimonials and a few preliminary studies in tumor cell lines and in mice, critics say, there is no evidence of the safety or efficacy of the compound, popularly known as the "cancer pill" or "fosfo." Several thousand patients are estimated to have taken it. Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has until 13 April to decide whether to sign the bill into law." - Rod57 (talk) 16:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Added in 14 april 2016 - Today Dilma Rousseff finally decided to authorize the production of Phosphorylethanolamine — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14C:5BD7:157:2159:7333:A46A:7F65 (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Fringe theory
[edit]I've notified Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Brazilian_cancer_pill. fgnievinski (talk) 16:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Phosphorylethanolamine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160727153855/http://www.globalpost.com/article/6784886/2016/07/25/human-tests-start-controversial-brazil-cancer-pill to http://www.globalpost.com/article/6784886/2016/07/25/human-tests-start-controversial-brazil-cancer-pill
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)