Talk:Phoronix

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Phoronix Test Suite
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Phoronix Test Suite

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 May 2019. The result of the discussion was merge.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This redirect is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux

Websites: Computing

	This redirect is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Linux distribution screenshots?

it offers Linux distribution screenshots? Wow! User:ScotXW^t@lk 22:21, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the sensationalism out of Wikis

Lots of this content was written in the style of Phoronix; there was a lot of detail on the owner (which should be kept in his wiki), along with sensationalist language commonly found on the website. Lets just keep the details about the subject in focus. Also, there were several sections dedicated to the rumors and articles written about the site; unless we're going to write about every story the site has published, we should also keep that content out too - otherwise where would we draw the line between important an unimportant?

Lets keep the history about chronological events, if there's agreement that some articles merit specific feature we should add a new section covering them to avoid muddying the history section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.91.134 (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

The BLP has sourcing issues in particular, it's largely based on primary sources. Widefox; talk 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Is this really notable? While it has gained some fame for it's benchmarks (and infamy for it's cheapo journalism) within Linux circles, there seems to be very, very little independent third-party coverage. --2001:999:91:286:A61D:EE2:CE18:404C (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]