Talk:Phone Losers of America

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

no consensus, 18/3/2006, see discussion.
no consensus, 15/2/2006, see discussion.

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

No more abuse

Don't post things like this:

Anirak says TALK!

Like, no! --Rolf L. Mayo
Some jackass removed my secret message

There's a forum for that, provided you never post or talk.

Most of the information on this page is pointless. If you want a page, I'd suggest just sticking to a broader history or the "group". Listing the issues of your useless zines is pointless. It's nothing that anyone would really want to know, because nothing groundbreaking was ever covered in any of them. Try just stating that you started off writting a zine and keep it to that. --intelshoe

This isn't even ArtiCAL worthy. Tokechu was obviously smoking crack (The drug of the FUTURE!) when wrote this. Why not put up something a bit more polished and professional, eh? (This unsigned comment was added by 24.208.124.76).

Please sign your comments. --Tokachu 00:43, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the CNBC interview should be put back in place. --Murd0c516 03:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a link on CNBC's web site? Or any information that could prove that it even happened? --Tokachu 16:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you ever try looking on the fucking main page of phonelosers.org? It obviously happened. --Murd0c516 17:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then please post it. Thank you. --Tokachu 23:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cactus?

AFD debate link

This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roy, New Mexico

Is the show really broadcast from Roy, New Mexico? -Chris Tomkinson. (cactus cactus) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.240.135.161 (talk) 07:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they're broadcasting from the PLA Situation Room in Roy, New Mexico on Prank Call Nation! Source: "Rand al'Thor sponsors today's extremely short show, but the good news is that this will be the last show from outside the Situation Room in Roy, New Mexico! At least one more show will happen this week from the studio. Woo hoo! " http://www.phonelosers.org/2014/08/snow-plow-show-august-25th-2014-inshedption/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.76.162 (talk) 19:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Situation Room Location

The headquarters actually aren't in New Mexico. Stop changing it back from Albany. TheDaJakester 02:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

cactus.

cactus? yeah, cactus. 2601:601:1700:C0C0:1BC:F30:1DC2:85DE (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CACTUS 2A02:8070:6280:6700:CD54:C225:BE75:A35F (talk) 21:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]