Talk:Phoenix Film & Television Productions
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
A tag has been placed on Phoenix Film & Television Productions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}}
on the top of Phoenix Film & Television Productions and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. B00016992 (talk) 16:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
So indicate it!
[edit]What is your rationale, then, for adding the hangon tag? Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 16:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
This not advertising for Phoenix but just an article about who produced some programs and DVD extras I like (ex: Soundcheck at Momo's, the extras of The Young Ones and the DVD Planet Corduroy). —Preceding unsigned comment added by B00016992 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
How should I rewrite it so it is more apropriate for Wikipedia Criteria? —Preceding unsigned comment added by B00016992 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Rewrite
[edit]First off, sign your comments with ~~~~, please
You might want to have a look at WP:MOS. That is the premier source of style instructions around here.
You have to be careful not to sound like you're promoting the article's subject, lest it get nominated for speedy deletion again. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 16:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Also, take a look at WP:N and WP:Notability (organizations and companies) – ukexpat (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
[edit]As the original nominator for speedy deletion, per this discussion and the minor re-write coupled with the assumption of good faith on the part of the creator, I've removed the SD tag. However, we should continue to monitor for notability. Cheers. Wisdom89 (T / C) 21:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Stub-Class film articles
- Stub-Class British cinema articles
- British cinema task force articles
- British cinema articles needing an image
- British cinema articles needing an infobox
- Stub-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Filmmaking articles needing an infobox
- Filmmaking articles needing an image
- Film articles needing an image
- Film articles needing an infobox
- WikiProject Film articles