Talk:Phocomelia

Phocomelia is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Phocomelia.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Text and/or other creative content from Phocomelia syndrome was copied or moved into Phocomelia with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled

phocomelia

... very good. 124.177.232.248 15:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this medical article is a stub. anyone else enjoying the irony?

lol I didn't notice that. Yes very ironic. --Meridius 16:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well a flid is a flid so it doesn't matter whether the two articles are merged Petestar1969 (talk) 18:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dick characters

Why is there a section on the fictional characters created by a specific author included in this article? Otto4711 (talk) 17:31, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I closed the rfd for now. I think you should get a consensus on whether to remove the paragraph or improve it to house characters of other literature. You could then re-nominate the RfD.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Phocomelia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100507104931/http://teratology.org:80/jfs/Pharmaceutical.html to http://www.teratology.org/jfs/Pharmaceutical.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Severe symptoms of Phocomelia/DK-Phocomelia?

Hi all,

Paragraph two in 'Signs and Symptoms' lists symptoms related to "severe" phocomelia. I'm having trouble finding a source for this (article references NORD in the text but I can't find a source to verify that.) However, symptoms for DK phocomelia Syndrome (https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/1894/dk-phocomelia-syndrome) matches this section pretty perfectly.

Is DK Phocomelia a separate diagnosis/disorder from phocomelia? And if so, should it have its' own page/subsection? OR is DK Phocomelia simply another term for severe phocomelia?

I'm going to do a little more research myself but I'd appreciate any input from others, thanks! V3ganf3lix (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undue emphasis on thalidomide

I think the first paragraph should focus on the condition. thalidomide is certainly the best known modern cause, but as can be seen there were cases long before modern drug use. That should be made clear. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 02:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]