Talk:Philosophical Society of Washington

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

On 1 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to PSW Science. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Addressing Template Message

The article was recently revised from a stub into a full-length article by an account with the same name as the article (PSW Science). It seems that revision drew the template message. I have since added a significant number of citations to the article and believe the template message can be deleted. Does anyone agree/disagree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CVSwalgreens (talk • contribs) 15:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 June 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 17:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophical Society of Washington → PSW Science – In 2017, the Philosophical Society of Washington re-named itself PSW Science, source https://pswscience.org/about-psw/ CVSwalgreens (talk) 17:03, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, per common name and understandable descriptor title. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It's been its name for nearly 150 years. Some modern branding isn't going to trump that in a hurry. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.