Talk:Philippine Revolution/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TRLIJC19 (talk · contribs) 03:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- Doing... TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- Valid maintenance templates and citation needed tags:
- Two CN tags
- Top of article has a notice for rewrite and cleanup
- Liberalism (1869-1871) cites no sources, and there is a template to remind
- Rise of Filipino nationalism cites no sources, and has a template for that and factual accuracy
- Criollo insurgencies is lacking in citations, as specified in the template
- La Solidaridad, La Liga Filipina and the Propaganda Movement is lacking in citations, as specified in the template
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Quickfail under #3 of the QF criteria. Sorry, the article lacks citations completely in several sections, as well as partially in other sections. There are valid {{citation needed}} tags, as well as numerous ref, cleanup, and rewrite tags. The prose is problematic, with MOS and NPOV concerns, in addition to reading like a poor translation in need of a rewrite and copyedit by a native English speaker. I recommend addressing the citation issues, getting it copyedited by the Guild of Copyeditors, and then renominating. TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)