Jump to content

Talk:Philippine Navy HDP-2200 Future Offshore Patrol Vessel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Original Analysis or Speculation in article

[edit]

Girder2139

The additions to articles such as notes that constitute 'original' analysis or speculation by contributors is specifically prohibited in Wikipedia.

See reference entries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research — Preceding unsigned comment added by Girder2139 (talkcontribs) 14:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes obviously. And it's also obvious that when editors "claim" that something is a speculation, they have to provide explanation and proof first before doing something such as unilaterally overriding an edit or delete it. That's basic logic of "you claim you prove". WaterMirror17 (talk) 08:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Addition of extraneous details to infoboxes

[edit]

On basic principle infoboxes should be 'concise', as per the reference entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Infobox Adding extraneous information that is not justifiably inserted in the article body does not hold to his principle and clutters the infobox. The constant adding of "notes" to the infobox also breaks what is standard practice observed on other articles.

--Girder2139 (talk) 08:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, but what is "concise" is debatable at times in the first place, thus the need of explanation and proof before doing something such as unilaterally overriding an edit or delete it. That's one of basic logic of "if you claim, then you prove". WaterMirror17 (talk) 08:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]