This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Philippa Langley article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
I have edited the article to better reflect the truth of events and standing. While I agree her push for excavation and investigation over several years was instrumental in actually starting the archaeological search, excavation and discovery of the remains, she was not the discoverer, did not take part in the archaeology, and did not credit the original article from 1975. It is extremely unlikely that she did not read the article in her own societies magazine. I would quote Occams razor for my reasoning, if questioned.
Audrey Strange wrote in 1975 in that article that "Their private car parks cover the centre and under one of these are the foundations of the thirteenth-century church, the dust and bones of the once-powerful king and saintly friars" - it is Audrey who should have received the credit for discovering the location, while Langley seems to have been aggrandising her own position. Going and standing in the car parks and claiming "I discovered it after I had a feeling it was here", seems far less credible once everyone realises she most definitely read the article. Chaosdruid (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think anybody disputes that a number of car parks, and other nearby locations, had been identified as possible sites for Greyfriars, but they were all discounted by subsequent (and eminent) historians. The car park that historians considered the most likely (but low probability) was across the road from the one that Langley had her "feeling" in. My reading is from that feeling, Langley and Buckley re-looked at the old maps and found an overlay that could justify digging in that specific car park (albeit Buckley was skeptical). However, as Langley/Richard III Society was mostly paying for it, and LCC was willing to provide some funding and licenses for the publicity, she was indulged. 78.18.228.191 (talk) 08:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I can see that Landley wrote about Audrey's work in both her books, recognizing her work; however, it is also clear that nobody believed Strange because of the perceived location of Greyfriars and Blackfriar's churches. It wasn't until one of Buckley's earlier digs turned up empty, that they realized their maps were wrong, and Langley and Ashton reworked the overlays to identify the Social Services car park as the most likely location. 78.18.228.191 (talk) 22:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
