Talk:Philipp Genschel
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: The article appears to have 1 source that is his profile at his employer's site, and the other 13 sources are academic papers. It needs independent reliable sources..
Lopifalko (talk) 10:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Is this a notable enough figure that there needs to be a Wikipedia page?
[edit]Considering the sources are from his employer and himself, I really do not see a need to have this page at all -- sure he's been published, but what makes him notable? Timberst (talk) 12:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)