This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
In the couple of months since User: Cameron Scott put these tags on the article, nobody else has made any comment. I've left it a while to see whether anyone would respond, but given the unstated implication of the tags (that I'm running the page as a vanity project, essentially), I'd like to see the issue cleared up.
Today I've gone through the article providing references for those elements which appeared to need them (I'm assuming that the list of books and the weblinks stand as their own citations). The "Conflict of Interest" tag is clearly more problematic, as it's clearly true that the page has been largely updated and maintained by me. (It's obvious, incidentally, that this goes on a great deal on Wikipedia -- see Special:Contributions/Afaras and Mary Ann Sieghart for a random example -- but perhaps I'm unusual in being open about it.) The crux here seems to be the words "It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page."
Now, while I'm obviously not the best judge, I've certainly done my best when updating this page to stick to objective fact rather than, for instance, puffing my books. Certainly so far nobody's popped up on the talk page and mentioned anything which specifically requires cleanup or violates NPOV. The main arguable point would perhaps be whether the quantity of the resulting material is disproportionate to my notability, but comparison with the articles for some approximate peers (see, for instance, Dale Smith (writer), Mags L Halliday and Nick Wallace, all of whom have contributed to the same fiction ranges as me and none of whom has done anything massively more notable) would suggest that it's about average.
Given all this... unless somebody points out further material that requires citations, identifies something that violates NPOV or otherwise objects, I'm proposing to remove both these tags in three weeks' time. I'll mention to the original tagger, User: Cameron Scott, that I'm doing this so that he has the opportunity to object.
