Talk:Philip Levy (historian)

This article was nominated for deletion on July 25 2009. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This delete nomination was for a different person.

Michelledavison (talk) 22:44, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

National Geographic source

Someone recently added a source from National Geographic in order to help establish his notability. However, our notability guidelines call for third-party sources; as National Geographic was his employer in this situation (which they admit in the article), they are not a third-party source. --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed this to Newsweek to avoid the employer conflict. Michelledavison (talk) 01:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]