Talk:Philip Collins Ltd v Davis

Image copyright problem with File:SeriousHitsLive.jpg

The image File:SeriousHitsLive.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Surely it's fair use, because the subject of litigation was royalties from that very CD! Wik idea 20:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you've got a picture of the royalties, perhaps, but the picture in question is of the CD cover. --Carnildo (talk) 23:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Can someone verify the proper spelling of this case? Seems strange that the plaintiff company should spell "Phillip" with 2 L's when the musician's first name is spelled "Philip" (1 L).--SidP (talk) 20:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Telegraph alongside Collins' own website spell it as 'Philip Collins Ltd'. 58.7.190.104 (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]