Talk:Philadelphia International Airport

Pennsylvania High‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Philadelphia High‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Parking at PHL

As a matter of general interest, it would be useful to add the parking capacities for the main and economy parking facilities. I could not find that information in a brief search of the internet, although a more thorough review might scare it up. Given how often the main decks and economy lots fill up, it would also be useful to include off-facility parking services, rates, and shuttle info. --Itsgeneb 14:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV/OR

The terminal section of this article reads like a review. There's talk about how good or bad a terminal is... How it feels, if it's "old" or "new". The word "excellent" is in use... Needs some work... I'll give it a shot. -newkai t-c 02:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Have fun with that.165.82.76.44 (talk) 22:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Terminal Improvements

Info on terminal improvements talks about work to be done in 2007. Time to update. 21 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Areback (talk • contribs)

PHL-CDG

Just to let you know that whoever put that AF is ending CDG-PHL and DL will be taking over the route is false. Delta has not made any announcements about taking over the route. I went to Air France's website and search for PHL-CDG nonstop flights and found that AF 365/366 is still operating on March 31 and it is still bookable on their website. I also went to Delta's website to search for the "proposed" PHL-CDG operated by Delta for April 1 and the only nonstop flight operating on that date is a codeshare and the flight is operated by Air France. I have removed the edits unless someone can give me a source, an announcement, or a flight number, etc. You are more than happy to revert my edits back. Thanks! Cashier freak (talk) 04:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To update, Delta has taken over the route, using a DL 757 on the flight. However it appears that this flight will be canceled after Summer 2011, or at least reduced to seasonal service. AF no longer flies into PHL.--Slgordon3 (talk) 10:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PHL/Istanbul

Citation?? It would be cool, but I see no evidence that it is happening?165.82.76.44 (talk) 22:20, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UPS Airlines

This article needs a mention of UPS activities at PHL. UPS operates a substantial hub at PHL, with flights to many big cities east of the Mississippi, as well as a few to the US west coast. It's also the main UPS gateway to Europe, with flights to Germany, France, and England. I will work on adding this info in the coming weeks. --Slgordon3 (talk) 10:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

Why refer to UPS air activities as "UPS Airlines"? They're just the air operations for UPS. Also, when describing the dedication of the site by Charles Lindbergh, the text reads "but it no terminal building until 1940" or something like that. Some please insert "had" in there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.42.15.229 (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i agree it does sound kind of stupid, however it is the formal name for UPS' air operations. See UPS Airlines. Slgordon3 (talk) 09:03, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/philadelphia/
Triggered by \bairport-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 12:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

US Airways operated by American Airlines

I have added a citation needed tag for the statement in the table that US Airways flights are operated by American Airlines. It has been removed several times, but a reference to support the statement has never been added (because one doesn't exist). As I've brought up at WT:AIRPORTS, US Airways flights remain operated by US Airways, not American Airlines. The two airlines operate under a single operating certificate, which names the operating airline as "American Airlines Inc or US Airways Inc". Reservations systems say "US Airways" or "American Airlines operated by US Airways" for US Airways-operated flights; they do not say "US Airways operated by American Airlines." And all that aside, per WP:PROVEIT, a citation needed tag should never be removed without adding a citation or at least discussing at talk. —Alex (Ashill | talk | contribs) 01:19, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So the only Airport in the Wikipedia reference that needs this is PHL. Knock yourself out requesting a citation needed on all the other pages.99.129.144.209 (talk) 01:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not willing to make the fight Wikipedia-wide, but the concern remains valid, and the fact that uncited stuff exists elsewhere doesn't make it OK here. —Alex (Ashill | talk | contribs) 01:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is common knowledge that US Airways has officially ended. You have hundreds of sources knock yourself out.99.129.144.209 (talk) 03:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Except it's not true. The Cactus call sign is gone, but US Airways flights remain separate from AA flights and the operating certificate lists both airlines. The burden isn't on me to support the claim that I'm challenging. As I stated, reservation systems say "operated by US Airways" for US flights; that would violate DOT rules if they were in fact operated by AA.

It is, of course, true that this will be a moot point by the end of the year when US Airways really does cease to be a separate operator (although that still won't change the fact that the entire destination table should be cited), but as long as it's here, uncited "common knowledge" doesn't make it ok when challenged. —Alex (Ashill | talk | contribs) 03:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Find it odd that you are so married to this need to cite this one airport amoungst hundreds that are not. Just site and be done with it since no one is going to do it for you.99.129.144.209 (talk) 04:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Varadero

Anyone know why the new Frontier flight to Varadero has been removed? It was supposed to begin in January 2017. There do not appear to be any indications on the web that Frontier's plans to fly the route have changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.209.178.11 (talk) 20:10, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

International Arrivals at Terminal A West/East

There's a contradiction that I can't quite figure out in the Terminal A West/East Section.

A West states that international arrivals except those with customs pre-clearance are processed at A West
A East states that Frontier international arrivals come into A East.

Do all Frontier international destinations have customs pre-clearance and, if so, wouldn't they arrive into the regular Frontier gates at Terminal E? --Overturn 91 (talk) 13:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding a clarifying statement to the A-West sentence to indicate that international flights arrive into A West and A East and are then processed at A West. --Overturn 91 (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Los Angeles - Philadelphia Nonstop

Hi I'm not used to editing so excuse me for my sloppiness. The Los Angeles service that is being added is operated by Alaska Airlines. Its stated on the Virgin America website and also on usatoday.com. Only San Francisco will be operated under Virgin America. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richie622 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that looks to be correct, good point. The Alaska article specifies that LAX-PHL was previous operated by Virgin, as well. --Overturn 91 (talk) 19:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

go on and change the entry and make sure you inline reference it properly so that everyone can see why you have added the detail.Andrewgprout (talk) 20:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the service will be on Virgin America aircraft as per http://www.philly.com/philly/business/transportation/Alaska-Airlines-to-begin-a-nonstop-daily-flight-from-Philadelphia-to-Los-Angeles-on-Sept-2.html. Please note that VX and AS are still two separate airline brands for now. The Virgin America name will disappear sometime in 2018/2019. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 01:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alaska's booking website indicates that this is operated by VX as well. I'll leave it as is. --Overturn 91 (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is PHL an American Hub?

Inspired by a recent edit, how is it determined if PHL is officially an American Airlines hub city? It's listed on their "hub fact sheets" page (http://news.aa.com/multimedia/default.aspx#factsheets) which includes the phrase "PHL is American’s largest transatlantic Northeastern hub" and is listed as a pilot crew base, in-flight crew base, and maintenance base. --Overturn 91 (talk) 20:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FAA Airport diagram for PHL update

Hello and good day. The FAA diagram in the inbox should be updated as runway 9R/27L has been extended to 12,000 feet as per diagram for PHL in external links.Please replace with diagram dated October 11, 2018 that is in external links. Thank you and have a good weekend.2601:581:8000:21B0:304C:CD3D:3958:6A95 (talk) 21:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC) Was done 10/22/18. Thank you.2601:581:8000:21B0:304C:CD3D:3958:6A95 (talk) 22:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Routes

I’m having difficulty in changing the destanations due to my device not playing nice. But can someone add SLC and Santiago.

Also PSA (American Express) added Daytona.

thepointsguy.com/news/american-airlines-phl-new-routes/ Huskermax5 (talk) 07:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

T

H 100.14.124.33 (talk) 18:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:PHL (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rent a car 2603:8081:7900:E2F:3C7C:A559:74F4:8DB4 (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]