Talk:Phil Mauger

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New Zealand: Politics Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Own article

Is this going to become its own article soon? AlphaZetta (talk) 08:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

IMO the article goes into excessive detail when it is talking about his "controversies". I pay pretty close attention to the news and I haven't seen anything about these. I don't think they are significant enough to take up so much of the article. Definitely imbalanced. 119.224.38.234 (talk) 11:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the Political life section needs major expansion to add balance. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 17:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some effort to improve the neutrality. I'd appreciate comments and consensus-making on whether it is now at an acceptable standard to remove the WP:NPOV warning from the page. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 20:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]