Talk:Phases of ice/Archive 1
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions about Phases of ice. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 06:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that there are at least 19 phases of ice, though only one is normally seen on Earth?
- Source: [1]
- ALT1: ... that a rare phase of ice can be present inside diamonds formed deep in the Earth's mantle? Source: [2]
- ALT2: ... that ice in outer space is amorphous solid, and it is likely the most common phase of ice in the universe? Source: [3]
- ALT3: ... that one of the artificially produced phases of ice, ice XVII, could potentially be used for hydrogen storage in environmental technology? Source: [4]
- Reviewed:
Converted from a redirect by InformationToKnowledge (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.InformationToKnowledge (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC).
- Article has been copied from a section in another and then expanded more that tenfold. No visible problems, good to go. I prefer ALT2. Cambalachero (talk) 02:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Metcalfe, Tom (9 March 2021). "Exotic crystals of 'ice 19' discovered". Live Science.
- ^ O. Tschauner; S Huang; E. Greenberg; V.B. Prakapenka; C. Ma; G.R. Rossman; A.H. Shen; D. Zhang; M. Newville; A. Lanzirotti; K. Tait (2018). "Ice-VII inclusions in diamonds: Evidence for aqueous fluid in Earth's deep mantle". Science. 359 (6380): 1136–1139. Bibcode:2018Sci...359.1136T. doi:10.1126/science.aao3030. PMID 29590042. S2CID 206662912.
- ^ Pappas, Stephanie (2 February 2023). "Scientists created a weird new type of ice that is almost exactly as dense as water". Live Science.
- ^ Del Rosso, Leonardo; Celli, Milva; Ulivi, Lorenzo (June 2017). "Ice XVII as a Novel Material for Hydrogen Storage". Challenges. 8 (1): 3. doi:10.3390/challe8010003.
Large number of refs to del Rossi
The article has a lot of refs to one primary reference:
- del Rosso, Leonardo; Celli, Milva; Ulivi, Lorenzo (7 November 2016). "New porous water ice metastable at atmospheric pressure obtained by emptying a hydrogen-filled ice". Nature Communications. 7 (1): 13394.
This seems inappropriate for a short non-review source. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I didn't spot it at first because of how it and several other references were hidden behind that {{r| template, but now that I removed it to standardize reference structure, I see that the large chunk of that section is referenced to either that article, or its apparent 2017 and 2020 follow-ups from the same researchers. Clearly not ideal, but then again, this whole subject appears to have been niche enough that only a few researchers dominate the output at any given time.
- Now that I completed the sequence of discovery dates in the table, this seems especially apparent: effectively, Bridgman discovered the first group of phases in the 1900s, then Whalley discovered several more in 1960s, a few more phases were discovered by various researchers in the 1970s-1990s, and then the bulk of recent discoveries appear to belong to Saltzmann and del Rosso groups. I am not sure if it's going to be easy to find many alternate references to balance out those sections. InformationToKnowledge (talk) 19:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Ice XI is thought to be a more stable conformation
The section on Earth has a paragraph about conflicting reports that appears to be WP:OR. That is the comparison and thus judgement of various primary references is done by a Wikipedia editor. I think the paragraph should be replaced by content from a review, eg
- Chaplin, M.F. (2024). Structure and Properties of Water in its Various States. In Encyclopedia of Water, P. Maurice (Ed.). https://doi-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/9781119300762.wsts0002