Talk:Phallus hadriani/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its cool when the genus is a visual epithet! ;) How about we just mention why Richard's genus has that name in taxonomy, for the cluelessly intrigued? heh Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It took a while for me to catch on to the wordplay there... lol. When I find a source that says explicitly what the genus name means, I will direct it instead to the genus article. Otherwise I'd lack justification for not inserting the same fact in the other 27 Phallus species' articles. Instead, I'll leave you with some century-old British humour: ""Phallus" is a genus of fungi, which does service here in indicating that there is no fallac-y as to the quality of the wine consumed." Sasata (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

heh... good enough! Pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Phallus hadriani passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass