Talk:Phacellophyllum caespitosum

Animals Low‑importance

Phacellophyllum caespitosum is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments more appropriate to talk page

I moved the block of text added as edit suggestions here and restored the original brief text of the article; if anyone wants to make the following changes, feel free. Her Pegship (talk) 18:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The present page contains few serious errors... * Phacellophyllum Gurich, 1909, is a junior synonym of Thamnophyllum Penecke, 1894; in case of synonymy the principle of priority states that the senior synonym should be used - in the present case Thamnophyllum wins with Phacellophyllum unless you can prove the two names are not synonyma. ** Anyway both names pertain to genera of the extinct Devonian family Phillipsastreidae, (and not to the Carboniferous family Lithostrotionidae) of the order Rugosa and not Tabulata. *** Thamnophyllum Penecke, 1894 (and its junior synonym Phacellophyllum Gurich, 1909) are colonial, dendroid to fasciculate corals, with horseshoe dissepiments and septa of trabecular fans, as revealed in thin sections. **** The cited link to Masutomi & Hamada, 1966, illustrates an uncut solitary rugosan, with attached old label naming Ceriopora verrucosa from "Gerolstein bei Eifel" in Rhenish Devonian in Germany; it is obviously a solitary rugose coral - as it is uncut its taxonomic position, not to say affinity with the Phillipsastreidae and Thamnophyllum, must remain dubious... ***** I have no idea how Phacellophyllum caespitosum looks like, as the following link is to a void page...^[1]

References

^ Phacellophyllum caespitosum

[1] Phacellophyllum caespitosum

[1]