Jump to content

Talk:Petr Chýlek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chylek's open letter

[edit]

Tony, I undid your edit for two reasons: 1) Your description of the edit was inaccurate. You changed a couple of key words in the 2009 Open Letter section, yet the reason for the edit described a link change. 2) Your two word change characterizes Chylek's verbiage as an accusation of behavior, when in fact, it was written as an appeal to stop a behavior.

Though couched as an appeal, it necessarily accused other scientists of the behavior it was appealing them to stop. This is the essence of the presupposition fallacy. --TS 21:43, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps we can find more neutral langauge, so neither of us is creating a characterization of what Chylek writes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.156.96.16 (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How about, he's accusing some of his fellow scientists of "[substituting] the search for truth with an attempt at proving one point of view" and appealing to them instead to "drastically modify or temporarily discontinue the IPCC" and to stop "making unjustified claims and exaggerated projections about the future even if the editors of some eminent journals are just waiting to publish them." --TS 22:21, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think we're better off avoiding accuse or appeal, since we are then adding a presumed position to his intent. What if we use "requests" instead? He is making a request of the email recipients. Using that term to characterize what he is asking for is more neutral in tone. It's really not for us to say whether or not his verbiage is intended as an accusation, or with whether or not it is an accurate statement. Based on the text of his email, he believes the behavior has gone on. Our job as editors is to accurately reflect the intent of the email, and hopefully not nuance it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.156.96.16 (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I messed about with it a bit and ended up with:

The email says the climate science community has "substituted the search for truth with an attempt at proving one point of view" and suggests "Let us drastically modify or temporarily discontinue the IPCC." He also appeals for climate scientists to stop making what he calls "unjustified claims and exaggerated projections about the future even if the editors of some eminent journals are just waiting to publish them."

As Wikipedians we report the facts about opinions. We don't report the opinions as fact. I think that does it. --TS 04:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is acceptable. I made a minor revision to eliminate "says" in favor of "writes." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.156.96.16 (talk) 14:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLP noticeboard

[edit]

Section = 109 BLP articles labelled "Climate Change Deniers" all at once. This article was placed in a "climate change deniers" category. After discussion on WP:BLPN and WP:CFD the category was deleted. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 16:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Petr Chylek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Petr Chýlek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Petr_Chýlek&oldid=1206694691"