Talk:Petersen Rock Garden/GA1
GA Review
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 18:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Okay, only a few initial quibbles; this looks essentially ready to promote. Images check out, spotchecks show no copyright problems, article is neutral, sources appear reliable. Thanks for contributing another solid article.
Only one action point that I need you to look at:
- "It contains dozens of "fanciful" and "intricately detailed"" -- what source are these two quotations from? I didn't immediately find them in #3 or #7. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
- . Ooops. See the Via source (I just added an inline citation.) Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
- That's a pass, then. Thanks for your contributions here in both prose and images! -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.