Talk:Peter Talbot (bishop)

Peter Talbot (bishop) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 24, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Peter Talbot (bishop) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 July 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Peter Talbot, the Catholic archbishop of Dublin, was imprisoned in 1678 due to an anti-Catholic conspiracy?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Talbot (bishop).

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Peter Talbot (bishop)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: SkywalkerEccleston (talk · contribs) 08:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: PearlyGigs (talk · contribs) 11:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review

Hi, SkywalkerEccleston. I'll do this review as one of my "two-for-one". Although I'm a member of WP:GOCE, this is actually my second GA review. I'll do some reading and then come back to you, hopefully soon. Best wishes. PearlyGigs (talk) 11:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 12:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the article two or three times and made a few tweaks, as you can see in the page history. It's looking good but, to get my head around the WP:GA process, I just want to see how other reviews are done and how the criteria checks are recorded. I'll then need to consider the citations, though I don't anticipate any problems. The article is certainly well written and within scope. The coverage is wide enough given that there is only limited information about the subject. I'll try and finish this tomorrow. PearlyGigs (talk) 21:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

Well written. The prose is fine and there are no spelling, grammar, or syntax issues. I cannot see anything that jars against the MOS, although I have done a small amount of copyediting which I thought would help. Some people might think the lead is short but, given the size of the article and the absence of information in sources, I think it is concise and says all that needs to be said.
WP:V and WP:NOR. The reflist is good and the citations are presented in standard publishing format. No problems in this area and certainly no evidence of original research or copyright issues.
Breadth of coverage. Focus is within scope and coverage is adequate given limited information in sources.
Neutral. No problems.
Stability. No problems.
Images. Only the portrait but it is sufficient and there no problems I can see.

I think this is a good piece of work and so I will promote to WP:GA (need to check the process again, first!). An interesting read. Very well done. PearlyGigs (talk) 19:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you PearlyGigs!

SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 1:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 18:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Portrait of Peter Talbot

... that Peter Talbot (pictured), Catholic Archbishop of Dublin, was imprisoned in 1678 due to an anti-Catholic conspiracy?

Source: https://www.dib.ie/biography/talbot-peter-a8452

Reviewed:

Created by SkywalkerEccleston (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 01:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Article is long enough and was promoted to GA one day before DYK nom. Article is well-sourced, presentable, and copyvio-free. Hook is interesting and sourced. No QPQ needed. Image meets criteria. Good to go, thank you for your nominiation SkywalkerEccleston - Kimikel (talk) 21:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]