This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Has any reputable historian expressed doubt about the scope and nature of the crimes attributed to Niers? If so, the article should really mention that. It seems unlikely to me that such a body count could realistically be attributed to one individual working alone (even Elizabeth Bathory had collaborators), in secret, and in a pre-industrial epoch. When we factor in that the interrogation used torture, that folk songs were written about Niers and his crimes, that magical powers were attributed to him, and that the body count of "544, including 24 fetuses" is equal to "one murder a week, every week, for ten years"... well, it triggers my skepticism. DS (talk) 14:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the focus is on crime reports (rather than crime), and how Peter Niers became a figure of legend, a sort of boogey-man. There should be no need to find a "reputable" historian to express doubts (but, I've looked for them, without finding any in online sources); those doubts should be readily present in the reader's mind. I have also pointed out that in 1577, Niers was tortured in Gerlach, and torture should readliy be regarded as inflating the actual level of crime. That being said, it remains historically uncontroversial that in the anarchic state of 16th century Holy Roman Empire, there were lots of such robber bands roaming about the countryside.Arildnordby (talk) 15:12, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As for the body count, there is no particular reason why not Niers should not have been found guilty for each and every murder his gang was said to have made.Arildnordby (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your points are valid, although I feel they should be made somewhat more explicit for less-aware readers. I would also point out that we're not obligated to limit ourselves to online sources; as long as it's been published somewhere reputable. DS (talk) 11:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll see if I can put in some more explicit warning signals in the text. As for nononline sources, I perfectly agree with you that those can be used as well, but there is, after all, a question of accessibility, not the least for the editor making the article. I believe my article on Christman Genipperteinga is more explicit on warning the reader, but I would appreciate your critical input on that article as well.Arildnordby (talk) 12:02, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]