Talk:Peter Leahy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peter Leahy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Peter Leahy is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: Biography / South Pacific / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

Staff Check

I have added a section relating to Leahy's wife's directorship with Staff Check, a company that has recently been subject to media scrutiny due to commonwealth contracts that were awarded to the company; while Leahy remained in his position as Chief of the Army. As the allegations are cited with a reliable source (belonging to the business news website Michael West); the added section complies with Wikipedia's policy regarding biographies of living persons. (See: Wikipedia:Libel) Jack4576 (talk) 09:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Car photo

I've joined in the slow-moving edit war over the photo of the car used by the Chief of the Army. As it doesn't show Leahy and is (I assume) the car used by whoever the occupant of this position is, it doesn't have much relevance to the topic of the article. The car appears to be parked in the parking lot next to the Australian War Memorial and also appears to be empty. Nick Dowling (talk) 10:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to get twisted nickers over this, but I do object to some of the inaccuracies and non-sequiturs in various statements. The caption says: CA's car on ANZAC day 2008.

"it doesn't show Leahy" - Well no, Leahy is not visible in the photo. But what's your point? It's a picture of his car, not him.
"and is (I assume) the car used by whoever the occupant of this position is, it doesn't have much relevance to the topic of the article." - I don't follow the logic of this statement at all. Nor can I work out the point you're trying to make. As the caption says, the picture was taken 25 April 2008. Leahy was Chief of Army on that date. Therefore it was his car. How is that not relevant?
"The car appears to be parked in the parking lot next to the Australian War Memorial" - Assuming that you are correct, what would your point be?
"and also appears to be empty" - Again, what is your point?

OK, so it's a picture of an overpriced holden with mag wheels and low-profile tyres. So what? Well, as I've stated previously, it's got the "ARMY 1" registration plate, and a 3-star thingy on the front of it. Unless you spend a lot of time hanging around the front of R1, this is not a common sight. If you don't live in Canberra, I doubt that it's a sight you'd ever see. Also, who outside of Australia has seen a holden? I've seen heaps of photos of Cosgrove through a car window, but never was it apparent that he was sitting in a holden.

Yes, it could be a better photo, but as far as I'm aware, it's the only one available.

I really don't care whether you remove the photo or leave it there, but it is NOT without value, and NOT without relevance, and I object to spurious, irellevant and POV reasons for its removal.

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not too fussed about this either, but it seems unessessary to include a photo of the guy's car without him in it. The article on George W. Bush doesn't have a photo of Air Force One sitting on the tarmac and the articles on John Howard and Kevin Rudd don't have a photo of thier car. The photo belongs in the article on the Chief of Army, but it doesn't add much value to this article IMO given that it doesn't show either Leahy or the car doing anything in particular. That said, I'm not going to revert you or anything if you'd like to re-add it. Nick Dowling (talk) 12:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first comment is that it's the PM's car, not Howard's or Rudd's, so I guess this emphasises your point that it's CA's car, not Leahy's. So I guess that, somewhat reluctantly, I'm forced to admit that you're probably right.

Changing focus: Air Force One has its own page; the PM's limo has its own page. Maybe CDF/CN/CA/CAF/etc.'s limo should have a page? What do you think? Pdfpdf (talk) 12:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why would it have its own article? What evidence of independent notability do you have for a separate article for the the car of the Chief of the Army? -- Mattinbgn\^talk 12:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not "it". They. (i.e. One page containing information about all ADF senior leadership limos.) And before I answer that question, why do AF-1 and the PM's limo have their own pages? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I think I've moved us off-topic, but where else would it be appropriate to discuss this? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ugly page layout

It's very nice that Ajayvius added his ANZAC Day photos of Leahy and his car to the page, but it has made the page layout somewhat less attractive. Has anyone got any "attractive page layout" abilities? Pdfpdf (talk) 11:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Peter Leahy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140715024143/http://www.defence.gov.au/leaders/army/pLeahy/index.htm to http://www.defence.gov.au/leaders/army/pLeahy/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]