Talk:Peter Gurney

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Animal rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rodents Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rodents, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rodents on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RodentsWikipedia:WikiProject RodentsTemplate:WikiProject RodentsRodent articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Rodents to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Drafts
Cleanup : Beaver dam • Bolivian hemorrhagic fever • Campbell's dwarf hamster • Fancy mouse • Golden hamster • Guinea pig breed
Expand : Bolivian hemorrhagic fever • Least chipmunk (requested) • California ground squirrel (requested) • Lemming (requested)
Merge : List of literary accounts of the Pied Piper • Mousetrap
NPOV : Birbalomys • Gambian pouched rat • Golden hamster • Hamster ball • Mountain Beaver • Pacarana • Plague (disease) • Prairie dog • Rat-catcher • Syrian hamster variations • The Rats (novel) • Tree squirrel
Stubs : Rodent stubs
Update : Baird's pocket gopher • Beaver • Black squirrel • Chinchilla • Cypriot mouse • Eurasian beaver • House mouse • Rabies
Verify : Acouchi • Aethomys • Ailuravus • Allegheny woodrat • American red squirrel • Anatole (mouse) • Anomalomyidae • Apodemus • Arctic ground squirrel • Argentine hemorrhagic fever • Armintomys • Batomys • Beaver • Beaver dam • Black-tailed prairie dog • Blesmol • Bobak marmot • Eligmodontia • Guinea pig • Mountain beaver • North American beaver • Tokudaia
Wikify : Baird's pocket gopher • Golden hamster • Indian giant flying squirrel
Other : photo requests

Further work

If anyone fancies getting hold of a photo with consent and uploading it it'd be a nice addition to the article. Further references would also be very welcome. Chris Cunningham 01:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert rationale

I am somewhat concerned about potential copyright violation from the Telegraph Obit. Please see my comment on the releavnt user talk page. I am working to replace at least some of the reverted material with quotes and non contriversial material, and woudl appreciate other additions. Fiddle Faddle 06:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article now rewritten to remove copyvio, and with all salient information retained. I am leaving it as a stub since more on Gurney's work with guinea pigs needs to be added. Fiddle Faddle 07:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an expand tag because I still really think another source or two could considerably expand it. I also added back a few unnecessary reverts. Thanks for doing the needful in fixing my copyvio in the interim. Chris Cunningham 23:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. I thought I'd got them all, but obviously not :) Fiddle Faddle 06:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the cn tag

While I agree that the one major source is the source for the bulk of the article, I think it meets the need for citation regarding the CCT and Vedra S-S, so I have incorporated it there, rather than simply leaving it as the freestanding reference. I'm going to email the webmaster of the gurney site and see if they will contribute. Fiddle Faddle 07:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did, and it seems they were not interested. Fiddle Faddle 13:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this article properly balanced?

I don't want to set a cat among the pigeons, but Peter Gurney was a very controversial figure, and was disliked by some in the guinea pig world. This is not a personal judgement on the man, and I fully believe Gurney's friends who say that he was a charming and lovely man - and he was clearly devoted to guinea pigs. However, his website (PG's GPs - Peter Gurney's Guinea Pigs) was high-profile, and many new or potential guinea pig keepers found their way to it, and there was (and still is) much politically controversial material on it, as well as large numbers of personal insults against certain individuals.

Gurney was anti the Royal Family, the RSPCA, the RCVS, the BBC, Sainsburys, celebraity chefs, foxhunting, country pursuits, factory farming, scientific research on animals... and so on. Whilst he was FULLY ENTITLED to his views, and many of them may well have been absolutely justified and correct, the fact that they were so forcibly impressed on his website (often in rather rude language) did make him controversial, and I wonder if this article should not record, in some suitably sensitive way, the fact that he was controversial?

One example (of many) concerning the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (UK): 'The RCVS is totally without principle or ethical standards and its only purpose is to protect the monopoly that it has over veterinary care this country. The pain and suffering that so many of its members have inflicted upon animals and gross over charging of their owners is a national disgrace.' (http://www.smellyhippy.com/Peter_gurney/watch1.htm). Elsewhere on his website he calls the RCVS a "sick joke" and there are many similar names and insults.

On The Queen: Gurney refers to HM Queen Elizabeth as that "nasty old woman" and quotes include: 'This woman and her family are one not only one hundred percent supportive of all forms of cruelty to wild animal, which come under the sick heading of field sport, they engage in it.' (http://www.smellyhippy.com/Peter_gurney/news.htm)

On TV celebrity chefs Gordon Ramsey and Jamie Oliver: 'How sick can you get, about as sick as Oliver and Ramsey, they are both despicable human beings.' (http://www.smellyhippy.com/Peter_gurney/news.htm).

Again, on Jamie Oliver and his adverts for Sainsburys: 'I have informed Sainsbury that I will not step into one of their shops for as long as Oliver is being paid to advertise their goods.' (http://www.smellyhippy.com/Peter_gurney/news.htm).

On foxhunting 'The news that at long last the barbarians in red coats have had their disgusting activities curbed is good news.' (http://www.smellyhippy.com/Peter_gurney/news.htm).

Other pet hates: on Gurney's web site you will also find plenty of vitriol directed at animal testing (and testers), the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) (UK), the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (UK), and the Countryside Alliance (particularly their booklet, co-published with Sainsburys, about cooking game).

I have not altered the article, because I am aware that this is a potentially controversial issue itself! However, I feel that there should, at the very least, be a note to the effect that he caused some controversy through his political beliefs expressed on his guinea pig website. Timothy Titus 12:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is simple. The article has to be NPOV. Since it is a biog it should contain all relevant material, presented with correctly attributable sources cited, bearing in mind WP:RS at all times. That he caused controversy is only important in the article if the controversy he caused is:

A part of his biography rather than part of any controversy he caused
Cited properly
Reported neutrally, as it should be.

It seems to me that you have relevant references, so I suggest you incorporate what is relevant in an encyclopaedic manner. Fiddle Faddle 13:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've started it off. If you think it requires expansion please feel free to go ahead :) Never refrain from editing an article because editing it might be controversial. Only ever look at the topics and make sure they are relevant to the article. Fiddle Faddle 13:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bond

Can we learn anything more about this pig other than that it was off-colour?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peter Gurney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060911003445/http://www.oginet.com/pgurney/index.html to http://www.oginet.com/pgurney/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]